International Migrants and Japan

by Sayaka Kuroiwa

Today’s Japan

Today, Japan has become an ageing society gradually, and the number of children in Japan has been decreasing. Actually, I studied the population of Japan is 130,000,000, but today’s junior high school students study it 120,000,000. Japan facing the problem, some social scientists insist that Japan should accept more migrants. If Japan do so, how our society will be changed? And what should we do?

Japanese Society

Japan has one of the most unique cultures in the world. But Japanese people themselves don’t find it. And many of them often think of their society as single-culture one. Nevertheless there are many cultures in Japan even now. For example, there have been many living Koreans and Chinese in Japan for long time. And discrimination against them has remained strongly.

But, recently, Korean and Chinese culture and many tourists come to Japan. Especially Korean singers, actors and actresses are very popular among young people. So, young Japanese people come to accept new cultures.

Transnational Migrants

Now there are some transnational migrants who maintain strong, regular ties to their homelands and organize accept of their lives across national borders. Why do they so? I think one of the reasons is that they come to find their culture clearly by touching a new other culture. I regard that affirmatively. At least, I think it is not wrong, however, it is a fact that they can’t fit into their new surroundings completely.

My Opinion

I think that migrants need not forget their culture, and they may keep their culture and accept only pleased new culture. But I think they should be interested in new cultures. Then, Japan should be ready to receive new cultures. I suggest that education system must be changed the first. Japanese children who have flexible thinking should study that there are many kind of cultures in the world. This is a peaceful way to accept other cultures and other countries’ people.

Reference
Matsumoto Kenichi. 2002. Minnzoku to kokka. PHPsinnsyo.

Affirmative Action in Japan?

by Yuka Shiokawa

Until I read and watch the video, I did not know the existence of affirmative action in Brazil and the United States. After I learned a little about it, I start to relate this system to the ethnic minorities in Japanese society such as Okinawans or Zainichi Koreans. Then I thought whether Japan should adopt the affirmative action or not and my conclusion is no, because of the difficulties of categorization and some risks that might be caused.

Before the presentation, I did a brief research about the population in Brazil based on CIA’s data. According to that, there is a clear border between the blacks and whites drawn by Americans. However, in reality, it is not as simple. As it was described in the reading, since Brazil has very mixed colors for the historical reasons, it is hard to distinguish who is black and who is not. In addition, the ways they categorize themselves is totally different and vary for hundreds of types. So it is hard to decide who can be supported by the affirmative action and not.

I think more or less the same thing will happen in Japan too. If we adopt the affirmative action, some people might be categorized in the socially weak position. However, those people may not think they are. In fact, I have many friends who are Zainichi Koreans but I do not see any difference from myself. People around them would not even recognize them as Koreans or Okinawans if they do not claim it. Also, I do not think they would categorize themselves as socially weak people neither. As a result, I think it is going to be hard to draw the line for categorization since the self identification and identification by others varies as it does in Brazil’s color differences.

In addition, I think there are some risks too. Considering this type of situation around me, I am afraid that by taking affirmative action, it emphasizes the difference more than today and it simply ends up labeling them as inferiors. Also, there are some people who are ethically privileged in this society but struggling with some problems. It is possible that those people might get jealous of getting an affirmative action just because of their roots and this could be the cause to create racists. In conclusion, I think Japan should not take affirmative action because I do not think there is such clear distinction between the privileged and non-privileged in a sense of race inside of this country. It might help those who are socially weak systematically, but it can draw clearer borders and widen the distance mentally among people than today.

Will Latin-Americanization Happen in Japan in the Future?

by Yuriko Otsuka

In the book, Shades of difference; Why skin color matters, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn (2009), Eduardo Bonilla-Silva and David R. Dietrich said that the United States has becoming more like Latin America, where there are various mixed people who are said to be as one group. However, while people claim that they are consisted as one group, inequality still exists through their skin color, and people are facing a dilemma. This is called Latin-Americanization, and it is said to be happening in the U.S. now. The change of the immigration law allowed and more and more immigrants and a variety of races could be seen in America. As a result, more mixed children have been born. This is making it harder to categorize one’s skin color. Also, the proportion gap between whites and non-whites in the U.S. became wider, resulting that the number of whites is far more less that maybe in the future white supremacy could disappear or occur harshly than before.

The influence of the mass media has made Japanese more interesting to foreigners. For example, the K-POP, and Korean drama boom has made Japanese, especially girls and women to change their image against Koreans. They shifted their preference to Koreans due to the masculinity they show through TV. My mother and I for instance, like watching Korean dramas and TV’s. We used to have no interest, though one TV drama changed our ideas. In that drama, there was a guy whose face was very beautiful (this is how my mother expressed about him), and hence, she prefers watching Korean dramas now. In addition, the access and ease to go outside the country allowed people to meet many people from outside and give a broad view of how other people are like. Therefore, even though there are less numbers of couples compared to other countries, the trend of international marriage has gradually come into Japan.

However, problems still exist. While people open their mind broadly to overseas, the majority still cares about race. For instance, in Japan people still have some kind of prejudice against Asians; due to the relationship of colonizer and the colonized. In addition, we can tell that the majority of Japanese still distinguish themselves as Japanese or a foreigner, and among the foreigners we can tell that there is some kind of preferences. In conclusion, Japanese are gradually becoming more tolerant against foreigners as we can see from TV’s, while rules, regulations, and social norms still establishes some kind of line to distinguish foreigners and Japanese. Therefore, I think the influence of Latin-Americanization will be gradually happening in the near future, but would take more time compared to the U.S.

References:

Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, and Amanda E. Lewis. 1999. “The new racism: Toward an analysis of the U.S. racial structure 1960-1990s.” Pp. 55-101 in Race, Nation, and Citizenship, edited by Paul Wong. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, and Gianpaolo Biaocchi. 2001. “Anything but racism: How sociologists limit the significance of racism.” Race and society (4), 117-131.

Wikipedia, Gaikokujin keno (Dislike to foreigners). Retrieved from: http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%96%E5%9B%BD%E4%BA%BA%E5%AB%8C%E6%82%AA

As a “Latina”

by Moraima Flores

“We don’t have races here. We don’t have racism here.” (Bonilla-Silva & Dietrich p. 40) is how Latin America is described. Coming from a Latin American country I felt identified with this statement, because, as I see it, someone born in Paraguay is Paraguayan not matter the color of their skin or the roots of their family. In comparison with the United States division of races (white-black) Latin America has a more complex way of looking at “race.” We define “race” as color, meaning that it doesn’t matter if your parents have roots in Africa and Europe (black-white), if you are light-skinned you are white, or maybe the other way around. There are also more complex ways of defining color, because we don’t divide everything in “black and white;” but we also make differences between lighter and darker. By “making differences” I refer to recognizing, not discriminating.

As Bonilla-Silva and Dietrich pointed out, Latin America is color-blind. With my background, I have to recognize that I always thought of the United States as a racial discriminating country. Why? Because, while Americans openly talk about race and make differences (racism 1.0), we don’t openly talk about or pointed out (racism 2.0). I guess I was fooled by this because color-blindness sounds liberal, not discriminative, and equal (in the end, we are all Latin Americans!). We fail to recognize something important in this theory: the human being always makes judgments.

Once someone asked me “how long do you think it takes for a person to judge another one?” Needless to say I have no idea, but many people say it takes less than 30 seconds. Now I ask you, what do you think we measure when we make these judgments? If we only have 30 seconds from the moment we meet someone, looking at how we dress, how we walk/talk/smile and of course the color of our skin is not a crazy idea, is it? We base all these judgments on appearance, including skin color, color of hair and eyes, bone structure, etc. (phenotype); the rest comes later. With this I only mean to point out that we are all “racist” in some level, whether we are aware of it or not.

From a Latin American point of view, I have trouble understanding the American division of race. Race is not something visible, color is; and although I am not saying we should forget about race and make differences based on skin color, as I said before, it’s something we already do unconsciously. However, maybe we should keep making differences in a way of positive discrimination.

Reference

Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo and David R. Dietrich. 2009. “The Latin Americanization of U.S. Race Relations.” Pp. 40-60 in Shades of Difference: Why Skin Color Matters, edited by E. Nakano Glenn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

About International Migration in Japan

by Yuuki Tashiro

These days, in Japan, the topic of international migration is discussed eagerly. I think that there are two reasons about it. It is a declining number of children and a tide of globalization. Compared with the US and western countries, the population of migrant is very low. But in Japan, government tries to add to not only foreign workers who engage in white-collar work but also foreign workers who engage in blue-collar work. If a present migrant low in Japan is changed and it becomes more relaxed than this of now, of course, this decision will have big effects on the people in Japan and the international migration.

In this class, I studied the case of Boston about international migration. In Boston, many foreign people came to there depending on the same countries’ people. As a result, colonies where these people live together appeared. Besides, the little Tokyo and The China town is same case. If Japanese government make a low which allow foreign migrant to live in Japan, the same colonies will appear as The US. However, it is also said that such colonies had already existed. For example, I can give the instance of chuukagai, China town and Korean town. These towns were made by Chinese and Korean. I think that there are two problems about this issue. Firstly, it is the coexistence between their culture, language and these of Japan. Japanese society is often said that quite exclusively. There is one proverb which shows this Japanese nature. “gou ni haireba gou ni sitagae ”. This words mean that if you live in other region you should follow the region’s customs. I guess the proverb show Japanese nature well. So some conflicts will occur. However , as China town in Yokohama and Koube, the conflict will become reconciliation as the years went by. Secondly, public services and facilities for migrants is also issue. A lot of these service and facilities deal with them in English or Chinese, Korean. Although, if migrants who can’t speak these language live in Japan, they will be not able to take these services quickly. I think that this problem is related to Japanese education system. Ordinary Japanese are not proud of other language. Besides, multilingualism is not firmly established in Japan because the population of foreign people is low. So it is also important to established multilingualism in Japan to add to migrants.

Globalization and Homogeneity

by Ayana Ebisuno

As world is more globalized, we would feel more comfortable and many things would become more convenient. For example, now we can talk with friends who are in other side of the globe, we can take same classes that is held in American universities even if we are in class rooms in Japan, we can see many news all of the world even if we do not go out from our house if we use the Internet.

More and more students all over the world are studying English as a second language because English have been becoming global common language. On the other hand, there are many languages that are disappearing at fast rate. This problem is known as “language death.” Many people around the world are worried about it. And most specialists agree that no language can survive unless about 100,000 people speak it. But unfortunately, half of the world’s languages are spoken by fewer than 10,000 people. And quarter of all languages are spoken by fewer than 1,000 people. Specialists estimated that about 10 languages disappear every year. And when a language dies, its culture also dies with it. This fact is a worry not only for specialists but also for ordinary people all over the world.

When we lose a language, it means we also lose a lot of important knowledge and understanding of the world we live in. There is also a close connection between language and personal identity. As the number of people speaking a language in a community decreases, there is often increase in social problems. This is one reason why saving language is important even if they only have a few speakers.

We cannot easily say that “language death” problem happened due to only the globalization. That problem has caused by not only globalization but also many other changes, for example, population, personal consciousness, and so on. But I think the problem has something to do with globalization, because it is cultural and economic connection and assimilation to each different country that promote the globalization. Living in the world where the globalization is promoting, it is important to considerate small countries and weak culture and save them.

Increasing the Immigrants, Increasing the Latinos

by Yukitaka Nishina

The number of Americans who were born in foreign countries has risen in recent decades. It reached 38 million in 2007 or almost 13% of the population. When early 1990s, most immigrants came from Europe, but now most immigrants come from other parts of Europe and especially, Latin America.

Immigrants who rooted from Latin America or Spain are called Hispanics or Latinos. They are from such a counties Spain, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, or any Central American countries or other Spanish-Speaking culture. In 2008, there were an estimated 47 million Hispanics in the U.S, making up about 15% of the population. Why is that rate increasing? Immigrants come for some reasons, such as to escape poverty or oppression. GDP per capita of the U.S. is about 1.7 times more than Spain, 3 times more than Mexico, as for comparing Honduras, 13 times more. Mexico is ranked 1st as Child poverty country according to UNICEF. (Child poverty is defined as the share of the children living in the households with income below 50% of the national median). By living and earning money in the U.S, they can get a better life for themselves and their children. Most of immigrants come from developing countries.

Immigrants also come from developed countries. I’ve watched a video on the web. A middle age person lived in Spain earn his living by selling pocket tissues for drivers waiting traffic lights. Most of the cars are passing the street, few are stopped by the signal. Most of drivers ignore him, few tender driver listen to his talk and buy the tissues. He was fired a trading company. Spain was the high growing countries in the EU between 1997-2007. Economic growth was 3.7 per year. It causes Spain joined the EU.  A Spanish price level was lower than other countries in the EU so that the capital came from England, German and France and so on. Since the effect of the Subprime Lending Crisis in the U.S., the domestic real estate finance didn’t work smoothly in Spain. Spanish economy is going down since 2008.  He is a one of the people who is influenced the depression. He can speak English thanks to working for trading company. He wants to go to the U.S. He is a one of the people who want to escape the depression.

There has been some falloff in immigration since 2007, mostly because of the U.S. economic recession, but immigration levels remain high. Hispanics are the largest minority in the U.S., and their numbers are increasing rapidly. By 2050, rate of Hispanics or Latino are expected to make up close to 30% of the population.  Is the day that the U.S will be the country of the Hispanic soon?

Immigration in Europe

by Ryoko Yorifuji

I think about immigration, especially in Europe. In Europe, many immigrants are discriminated for their religion, race and culture.

Recently, Muslim in France became issue about scarf; emblem oh Muslim. Many Muslim women wear scarf for hiding their hairs. Because in Muslim doctrine, women must hide their hairs; female hair is sex symbol. But, the French understood that the doctrine discriminate against women and scarf is symbol of woman discrimination. So France ban from wearing scarf. However, in fact, it says that France hates to flood Muslim symbol in their country, so they forbid scarf. From this issue, Muslim increase in France and French don’t wish Muslim immigrate from their hometown.

The similar issue occurs in Germany. In Germany, a population of Turk increases. And they form Turkish town and live there. German is worry that their town changes to other culture and their works are robbed by Turk. So, sometimes exclusionary movements against Turk occur. The movements are violent, so Turk and peaceful German become anxious. Moreover, both sides more and more oppose to each other. From this issue, the discrimination against race is exists.

Well then, why these immigrants come to Europe? I answer this question.

First, immigrants search their jobs and come to Europe. First I explain about the case of France. In the past, France had many colonies in North Africa. So, many people in North Africa can speak French. And as you know, North African people mainly believe in Islam. After WW2, France needed a lot of the workforce. Then France imported the workforce from North Africa, and carried out. But after the workforce don’t need to France, immigrants continued to live in France and call their family or relative. Therefore many Muslim live in France and oppose to France about religion or culture.

Second, I explain about the Germany’s case. In the case of Germany, Turkey was not German colony. However, many Turk brought to Germany as the low-priced workforce. And similar French case, they called their family, relative or friends and they formed Turkish town in Germany. In the town Turkish is spoken, Turkish goods flood in the town. So the town is seen an entirely different culture by German, and become an object of exclusion.

After all, a start of immigration in both countries made themselves. So, two countries have to make an effort to get along with each other. They should not discriminate against other culture. Then these countries had better make a system which forbids discrimination or prejudice against different culture. However, perhaps such a case is occurred in other countries. Especially immigration is rapidly spread with globalization. Then how other countries deal with such a problem? It is difficult to solve the issue, but we have to try to settle it.

Reference
Naito M. (2004) “Europe and Islam” Tokyo: Iwanami syoten
Aziz A. Effie F. (2007) “Islam in Europe: diversity, identity and influence” Cambridge University Press: Cambridge

Japan Should Accept More Immigrants

by Momoyo Tanaka

Japan should accept immigrants.  In recent years, because of globalization, immigration that means moving to a foreign country is very active.  According to the lecture in the class, of the 6.5 billion people in the world today, 191 million just under 3 percent are international migrants[1].  Japan is not an exception to this phenomenon, and there are more than 9 hundred thousand immigrants in Japan[2].  There are 3 reasons that I agree with immigration: solving the problem of aging society with a falling birthrate and inter-cultural communication.

First of all, immigration would solve the problem of aging society with a falling birthrate.  Recently, Japanese population is declining rapidly, and one researcher expressed that the population of Japan will be 95 million by 2050 (Now, there are 120 million people.)[3].  If it happens, elderly people retirement plan would not work and they would not have enough medical treatment and nursing.  Then, if a lot of immigrants come to and live in Japan, Japanese economy would be more active, and welfare system would be supported by not only Japanese youth but also many immigrants.  In other words, it would ease the tax of welfare for elderly people burden on youth for each person.

Second, immigration would bring Japan inter-cultural communication.  Though many goods, much money and information are crossing over the world from Japan, it is strange that immigrants are restricted.  Some people may worry about the risk of losing Japanese traditional culture, but in the lecture, early sociological research on the incorporation of immigrants into the host society focused on assimilation.  Also, immigrants are selective in how they adapt.  Once Japan was the racially homogeneous nation, but thanks to immigrants since Meiji era, Japanese are able to communicate globally.  We can learn other language from native speakers, speak language we are learning, make friends from other country even in Japan. A lot of Japanese tend to be introversion, so it is good for many Japanese being apt to turn inward to have a chance to communicate with foreigners.

Immigration brings Japan a lot of economic and emotional advantages.  They would solve the problem of aging society with a falling birthrate, and promote Japanese economy and welfare system.  Also, many Japanese would have chance to communicate with foreigners if immigrants increase.  Thus, Japan should accept more immigrants.


[1] Rubén G. Rumbaut “Immigration’s Complexities, Assimilation’s Discontents” 2008

[2] Searchna “Japan also think about ‘Problems of Immigration’ seriously” April 29, 2012. http://news.searchina.ne.jp/disp.cgi?y=2010&d=0210&f=column_0210_003.shtml

[3] ALTERNATIVE BLOG “Japanese Population” April 29, 2012. http://blogs.itmedia.co.jp/business20/2011/02/3000-2eb8.html

What Are International Immigrants and the Problem?

by Akiko Takano

From the late 20th century, the movement of the people cross borders becomes popular more and more. The people work, live and make a family at the place they emigrated. Emigrants usually use the connection with the person who moved another country formerly and move the country. In that way, immigrants began to increase and they make community. What in the world is the international migration? We need to know immigrants to understand and respect their value. I’ll introduce the kinds of immigrants and then focus on transnational immigrants and its problem in this essay.

Immigration can be classified three types. The first is the emigrants to find work. They move another country to get stable job with good wages and affluent life.  Actually, most of the immigrants are certain rich because they need funds to move and local network. The second is refugees who move to escape persecution. The number is not small so refugee is big flow of people and influence global society. Moreover, the illegality emigrant exists, too. Because they do illegal immigration and an over stay, they don’t have the regular stay qualification. Thus, the people who move from the mother country to the other countries have various cases.

The people who cross the border aren’t always settle down in one place. Some people value a connection with the hometown, and go back and forth in homeland and the emigration place many times. They are called “transnational immigrants”. I explain with example of Australian immigrants from China who I met. I went to Australia and stayed for a month this year. Australia is a multiracial nation with many emigrants. My host family was immigrant from China. Their house was Australian style, but meal was Chinese and spoke Chinese at home. They looked leave the custom of the mother country while adopting Australian culture. In addition, they did telephone and Skype with the family in China frequently and said that we returned to China every year. Therefore “transnational immigrants” keep the connection with the family beyond the border and have both of culture and the customs of emigration place and of the mother country.

The movement from the country to the country becomes easier than before, and “transnational immigrants” increased by the development of the transportation, but there is the problem. “Brain drain” happens. “Brain drain” is person with specialized knowledge and technique emigrates to other country whose work condition is better. It means that the elite are lost in the emigrant sending out country. What regulation makes is important to prevent the relations between acceptance country and the sending out country from turning worse.