by Kohsei Ishimoto
In Evelyn Nakano Glenn’s Shades of Difference: Why Skin Color Matters (2009), Joanne L. Rondilla looks at the different techniques are used in the cosmetics industry. When looking at the Philippines, advertisements focus on ‘whitening’ the skin, because the people in the country tend to have darker skin. On the other hand, when looking at European countries, advertisements look at ‘brightening’ the skin, for there is the idea that people in these countries naturally have light skin.
When looking at these advertisements, it can be seen that to be beautiful, you must have white skin. Rondilla explains that there are many people in the Philippines who buy skin-whitening products to look beautiful, but is being ‘white’ really being beautiful? The main answer to why ‘white’ is thought to be ‘beautiful’ is colonization. To the countries that had been colonized, the European countries had been superior, fixing the image that ‘whites’ are ‘better’.
When reading Rondilla’s chapter, however, it can be seen that there are various ‘types’ of white skin. One is the European beauty that was mentioned earlier, and the other the ‘Asian beauty’. This refers to East Asian countries, such as China and Japan. Filipinos are actually looking at ‘Asian beauty’, possibly because these countries are closer to them. In Japan’s case, the country looks at being ‘white’, trying to achieve the European look. This statement can be said to be wrong however, for recently Japanese people want to be seen as individuals.
When looking at various advertisements, it can be seen that models of different skin tones are used. For advertisements that use ‘white’ women, companies state that they are the ‘result’ of the product. On the other hand, companies that use models of a darker tone state that it does not look ‘right’, telling the consumers to change by buying the product. It is a fact that many purchase skin-whitening products to gain their ‘beauty’, but exactly how close are they to their ideal image? Will consumers ever believe that they are beautiful enough? The answer to this is probably no. The cosmetics industry has control over the consumers, by selling only a small portion of a product, or changing advertising techniques to trick us into believing that our images are not yet satisfactory. When thinking about this, it is interesting to wonder why people use cosmetics in the first place. Can not having any make-up on be considered beautiful? The answer to this can be explained through society; how people see you, and how you want to be seen.
Related articles
JAPANsociology 
“The main answer to why ‘white’ is thought to be ‘beautiful’ is colonization.”
From what I’ve read so far, this is not true. It seems that generally men tend to prefer women with “light skin” (which doesn’t equal “white”), just as they prefer big eyes, full lips, softness etc. This feminine beauty ideal is much older than colonization and, obviously, Japan hasn’t been colonized, yet it’s present there as well. On the other hand, bright skin isn’t part of the male beauty ideal.
Another reason is, that pale skin used to be a sign of wealth, because rich people spent their time inside. Being suntanned meant that you had to work on the field all day. Remains of this idea are possibly still present in Asian countries.
Pingback: From Ebony to Ivory: Colorism in the Philippines | JAPANsociology
Pingback: White is right: Body decoration, skin color, and beauty in Japan | JAPANsociology
Pingback: Beauty Standards in the White Imagination | JAPANsociology
Pingback: Beauty Standards in the White Imagination | Ci+(ribi)²
Pingback: The trend of Japanese whiteness | JAPANsociology
Pingback: Color complexes in the Philippines | JAPANsociology