Immigrants Should Be Bilingual or Not

by Chika Oki

Bilingualism is the positive action which tries to use two languages in our daily life or promote education of two languages. Bilingualism is popular and supported, particularly in the counties which have a lot of immigrants who speak various languages, like the United States or Canada. At the same time, however, in those countries some fears that their native language may be replaced by another language, try to promote monolingualism, and immigrants are sometimes forced to use one language. In fact, being bilingual brings many good effects. In addition, there is no precedent that one language took place of another country’s native language.

First, being bilingual make your brain smart and efficient. Some studies have proved that children who can use two languages show better and efficient performance than those who speak one language when they are asked to do complicated tasks. Also, some experts found that those who are bilingual have less risks of becoming dementia, and even infants, they show better responses if they are growing up surrounded by two languages (Yudhijit, 2012). Thus, being bilingual obviously brings from children to elderlies some physical advantages.

Second, immigrants will be able to have a good social relationship by speaking two languages. Some immigrants’ children who are forced to speak the language of their settlement have difficulty in communicating with their parents because they can’t understand their parents’ mother tongue. On the other hand, if they use only their native language, they can’t only communicate with other people but get a job. Keeping their native language is very important to protect their identity and culture, but it is also necessary to master another language to assimilate to their new environment. So, immigrants should try to master two languages positively.

The problem is how to promote bilingual education. The easiest way is to enroll in immersion school, where you can efficiently learn two languages at the same time. However, like Japan, some countries don’t have many immersion schools. In this case, immigrants should try to learn the country’s language and make their children understand how it is advantageous to be bilingual. Then, they should teach their children their native language by themselves because children are unwilling to go to special school in their leisure time, and it will promote more communication in family. In this age of globalization, the movement of people from one country to another country will never end, so bilingualism is now an indispensable idea for all immigrants.

Reference

Yudhijit Bhattacharjee, “Why Bilinguals Are Smarter,” The New York Times, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/18/opinion/sunday/the-benefits-of-bilingualism.html?_r=1

Filipina labor migration

by Naoko Ohshima

There are 120,000 to 150,000 foreigners who are engaged in the sex industry in Japan.  They are generally admitted to the country by promotional visa or tourist visa.  The promotional visa is issued by agreement of Philippine-Japanese government.  And singer, dancer and actress who have special skill are given it, so they cannot work under working purpose other than it.  Therefore, it is of course illegal to employ Filipina who came to Japan by promotional visa as hostess which is the service industry.  Philippine pub lined up in all parts of Japan, this illegal act is practiced as naturally.  In unprincipled employer, there are even employ women as hostess, shield illegal working and threaten Filipina to do various ways.  By embarkation wages are not yet paid, they make Filipina to earn pocket money, make customer accompany and force prostitution.

It is difficult for Filipina to access to a medical institution or other public institution who are not good at speaking Japanese and what was worse, they reside in Japan illegally.  Many foreigners who are engaged in the sex industry are compelled to work with higher risk than Japanese.  However, a part of Japanese say “They come to Japan with knowledge of it, so there is nothing they can do about it.”  What if they understand it before they come to Japan, everyone all should have human rights.

In this way, you may have discrimination and prejudice against foreigners who leave their countries in search of work and women working in a bar, but we should think that it is because of Japan and Europe and American in satiation.  They have come to Japan not to do all they could for Japanese men but to want their families in their mother countries to lead any comfortable life.

To abolish discrimination against Filipina, we have to understand more those background.  Not all Filipina practice prostitution, even if there is fact that they practice it, women are not doing it because they want to.  The first thing we have to do is know that for many Filipina to come to Japan to find work as entertainer is a big bet in their life and chance of a major turning point.  I want not to look Filipina with discrimination and prejudice, recognize them as members of supporting Japanese society.

REFERENCE

移住労働者と性産業 自ら動けない女性へのアウトリーチ http://www.realiser.org/report/lifestyle/article/index.php?id=195

農村での国際結婚 http://nanakokr.fc2web.com/philippines.html

フィリピンに関わる日本のダイレクトリー http://jphilnet.org/

広げよう人権 http://www.jinken-net.com/gozonji/knowledge/0310.html

Language Unity in Japan

by Naoya Suizu

Language is the important factor which shows the culture.  It is shaped for a long time and continues to change constantly.  Japanese is also such a language which continued to change historically.  Japanese is generally thought as the only language in Japan though there is a little difference among areas.  But, in fact, we will notice it is a mistake when we trace the Japanese history.  In Japan, there are actions people oppressed the particular language and tried to unify Japanese language once.  I will explain the fact by showing the two examples, the Ainu and Ryukyu language.

Firstly, the Ainu language is very important when we think about language unity in Japan.  It is the language which was used by Ainu people who lived in Hokkaido once.  Ainu people lived a free life in Hokkaido through hunting and fishing for a long time.  But the people who came from Honshu, the main land of Japan, changed the Ainu way of life in Edo era. They forbade the Ainu people to hunt, fish.  In addition, they robbed the Ainu people of the lands and forced the Ainu people to begin farming.  Naturally, the Ainu language is forbidden as one of the way of their life and the education of Japanese was forced.  When time passed, the language was forgotten and gradually disappearing.

Secondly, we mustn’t forget the Ryukyu language.  It is the language which was used in Okinawa once.  Okinawa was originally the kingdom of Ryukyu and it was independent from Japan.  In the kingdom, the peculiar language, Ryukyu language, was used and the peculiar culture was developed.   But, the people from Honshu came the kingdom in Edo era like Ainu, too.  After that, they forced the people in Okinawa to speak Japanese to strengthen their power in the land.  Moreover, the people in Okinawa hoped the return of Okinawa to Japan after the end of World War Ⅱ and tried to change their language in their own to be assimilated to Japanese custom.  Although the Ryukyu language exist the shape as a dialect now, its existence is very close to a crisis.

As everybody can understand my description, Japan unified the language once. In Japan, the understanding is not enough and I think many people think Japan is the country which only has one language.  But, the Ainu language and Ryukyu language exist in Japan now.  Furthermore, these languages are declining and put in the dangerous situation.  To solve the situation, the local people continue to try not to lose these languages.  The action is needed from now on and the protection as a nation and the nation understanding are very important at the same time.  I hope these languages are taken over all the time not to be vanished completely.

Reference

アイヌ政策のあり方と国民的理解. http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-21-h133-1.pdf

沖縄ー琉球の言語. http://okirekisi.livedoor.biz/archives/cat_10014470.html

Immigrant Children Should Be Monolingual or Bilingual?

by Daisuke Matsumoto

Which do you think is better bilingual or monolingual? Of course, in the U.S. people of English-Only have objection to bilingualism because they are afraid that the primacy of English would become weaker than before. In fact, since the late 1990s, educational policy in the U.S. schools has been moving away from bilingualism, but English-only disregard for benefits of bilingualism (Dyrness 2012).

The benefits of bilingualism for immigrant children are even greater than the benefits of only speaking mother tongue or English-Only. Bilingualism brings up family cohesion and gains self-esteem and stronger cultural identity. Moreover, these days Barack Obama recommended bilingual educations (Kraus 2012). To do so, there will appear a problem how to teach immigrant children. For example, there are many immersion schools, where children are able to gain bilingual by the end of elementary school. If both you and your wife or husband is Japanese, and immigrant to the United States, you should have the children go to immersion school. Then the children can learn both English and Japanese in English. This school has a good point to study main subjects like math or science in English available in the children’s future. In addition, you’d much better have them commit Japanese school on every Saturday. Of course, things, you know, don’t always go according to plan, but, the next suggestions will make you sure that the children will get to become bilingual by the age of 12 years old. There are 11 schools of Japanese immersion program in the United States.

(Miwa 2006)

These school teachers said that we found our students are more likely to acquire both Japanese and English language with increasing cross-cultural understanding, and even develop more self-esteem through this program (Miwa 2006).

Bilingualism, you know, keep Alzheimer’s or dementia disease from aggravating. In addition to the famous effect, some scientists say that bilingualism boosts brain power. According to the study from the U.S. Northwestern University, they monitored 48 healthy students included 23 bilingual students to different sounds―how to tell the speaker’s voice from chatter’s voice. Usually monolingual persons like me would feel unpleasant, and could hardly sound the speaker’s voice in the room of noisy chatter. However, these bilingual students were much better to process only speaker’s sounds. The study also proves by using scalp electrodes to trace the pattern of brainwaves that the bilingual’s brainstem responses work higher. Through this research, you can say that the benefits of bilingualism are very powerful.

Orange zone is the brainstem (Kraus 2012)

References

Dyrness, Andrea. 2012. “English-Only Teaching Ignores Bilingual Benefits” The Hart Courant. May, 23 http://articles.courant.com/2012-03-23/news/hc-op-bilingualism-makes-us-smarter-20120323_1_primary-language-second-language-largest-language-group

Miwa, Mitsuko. 2006. “Immersion Education in the USA―A study on the prospect of bilingual education” PDF. http://www.nier.go.jp/kankou_kiyou/kiyou135-193.pdf

Kraus, Nina. 2012. “Being bilingual ‘boosts brain power” BBC. May, 1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17892521

Should Japan Create a “Hostess Visa”?

by Sayaka Kuroiwa

Now there are many Filipinas who work as hostess in Japan. Besides some of them stay in Japan illegally. What makes them do so? One of the answers is ‘poverty’. They had little money in Philippine, so they come to Japan to earn money. They have ‘Japanese dream’. They are choosing ‘unfreedom of hostess work’ than ‘unfreedom of poverty’.

They are often despised because of illegal stay and characteristic of the work. Then, what does a hostess do? They sing with customers, play games, and drink alcohol, and so on. Most of customers are middle age men. The customers go to hostess bar to experience male superiority. Maybe Japanese superiority, too. And they go to feel exoticism. This work is not above other works in social status. But they are working to lead a rich life.

How are hostesses different from/similar to geisha?

There is a similarity between hostesses and geisha. They entertain male customers. But many people have better impression on geisha than hostesses. Actually geisha is tourist attraction in Kyoto. Why? It is because geisha has become one of Japanese traditional things, and many people regard them polite. On the other hand, hostess work often link with sex-work and human trafficking. Actually, the number of Filipinas who became a victim of human-trafficking is increasing in Europe, America, and Japan. So, in 2000, “Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime” was adopted. In Asia, ASEAN set a subject to remove women-trafficking.

Should Japan create a “hostess visa”?

I think that Japan should not create a hostess visa. To be sure, I want Filipinas to be protect by law, however, if Japan do so, Japan must allow sex-industry to come into Japan. The difference between hostess work and sex-work are so obscure. If create a new visa, Japan can’t help poor Filipina women truly.  Japan should remove poverty in Philippine first. As Japanese do, Philippine should raise the standard of education of Filipinas. And Japan should help Philippine with ODA, NPO…etc. I insist that creating a hostess visa does not become an essential solution to help Filipinas.

Globalization and Homogeneity

by Naoko Ohshima

Today the word “globalization” is often said in the world.  Globalization is defined as the spread of worldwide practices, relations, consciousness, and organization of social life.  Globalization emerged as the result of real world concern with the dramatic transformation of globalization as well as a reaction against the earlier perspective of modernization theory.  By the way, what is a profit of globalization for us?  I will state about advantage and disadvantage of globalization in the following.

First, viewed in enterprises, the profit of investment in bond in foreign countries and of direct investment in local countries are increasing.  These profits of investment in foreign countries are called income balance, “the balance of trade” which have made Japanese current balance in the black has remained at the same level so far.  This increasing of the black income balance is connected to the increasing of the black current balance, to the increasing of foreign assets.  This becomes more foreign investment, it is good circulation.

However, there is also disadvantage in enterprise point.  “The hollowing out of domestic industry” is accompanied by overseas expansion of enterprise, which affects declining in domestic product causes declining in employment.  Moreover, developing globally means that we will not only battle with domestic concurrent so far, but also competition with the whole world concurrent.  On-the-spot business habit, difference of social system and labor law, and correspondence to customer who has different culture will be rising.

Next, I state about advantage of globalization viewed from laborer and citizen.  In financial service, we can use internet and have dealings with only domestic financial institution, it become possible to invest financial assets overseas in an instant.  We can invest in financial merchandise which is at high rate of interest and make a profit.  Also in side of a currency exchange profit, more and more strong yen become, we can not only be blessed with advantage of Japanese yen in traveling abroad, but also declining of import goods due to the strong yen is advantage for citizen.

However, laborer’s wages decrease.  It is considered to cause declining laborer’s ability to negotiate due to globalization and intensive industrial capital and technical skill due to IT.  Moreover, gap between laborer who has skill and not skill will expand in domestic.  In case of Japanese laborer and the general public who go abroad, it is general to speak English as a universal language, so it may be most difficult to communicate with the local people.  And also in foreign countries, we need deal with local culture and society, so it may be difficult to come under local society if you have the domestic way of thinking and living thus far.

In conclusion, to consider globalization, we think of globalization of industrial organization.  However, if globalization of product, commodity and skill which are accompanied by corporate activity headed, globalization of laborer and financial service, it will become great challenge to Japan from now on.

REFERENCE

グローバル化のメリットデメリット http://jp.meritdemerit.com/topic/1014

要するにグローバル化とは http://www.psi-jc.jp/news_policy/program/03.htm

日本企業のグローバル化に3つの問題点 http://www.nikkeibp.co.jp/sj/2/column/a/69/

International Migrants and Japan

by Sayaka Kuroiwa

Today’s Japan

Today, Japan has become an ageing society gradually, and the number of children in Japan has been decreasing. Actually, I studied the population of Japan is 130,000,000, but today’s junior high school students study it 120,000,000. Japan facing the problem, some social scientists insist that Japan should accept more migrants. If Japan do so, how our society will be changed? And what should we do?

Japanese Society

Japan has one of the most unique cultures in the world. But Japanese people themselves don’t find it. And many of them often think of their society as single-culture one. Nevertheless there are many cultures in Japan even now. For example, there have been many living Koreans and Chinese in Japan for long time. And discrimination against them has remained strongly.

But, recently, Korean and Chinese culture and many tourists come to Japan. Especially Korean singers, actors and actresses are very popular among young people. So, young Japanese people come to accept new cultures.

Transnational Migrants

Now there are some transnational migrants who maintain strong, regular ties to their homelands and organize accept of their lives across national borders. Why do they so? I think one of the reasons is that they come to find their culture clearly by touching a new other culture. I regard that affirmatively. At least, I think it is not wrong, however, it is a fact that they can’t fit into their new surroundings completely.

My Opinion

I think that migrants need not forget their culture, and they may keep their culture and accept only pleased new culture. But I think they should be interested in new cultures. Then, Japan should be ready to receive new cultures. I suggest that education system must be changed the first. Japanese children who have flexible thinking should study that there are many kind of cultures in the world. This is a peaceful way to accept other cultures and other countries’ people.

Reference
Matsumoto Kenichi. 2002. Minnzoku to kokka. PHPsinnsyo.

Affirmative Action in Japan?

by Yuka Shiokawa

Until I read and watch the video, I did not know the existence of affirmative action in Brazil and the United States. After I learned a little about it, I start to relate this system to the ethnic minorities in Japanese society such as Okinawans or Zainichi Koreans. Then I thought whether Japan should adopt the affirmative action or not and my conclusion is no, because of the difficulties of categorization and some risks that might be caused.

Before the presentation, I did a brief research about the population in Brazil based on CIA’s data. According to that, there is a clear border between the blacks and whites drawn by Americans. However, in reality, it is not as simple. As it was described in the reading, since Brazil has very mixed colors for the historical reasons, it is hard to distinguish who is black and who is not. In addition, the ways they categorize themselves is totally different and vary for hundreds of types. So it is hard to decide who can be supported by the affirmative action and not.

I think more or less the same thing will happen in Japan too. If we adopt the affirmative action, some people might be categorized in the socially weak position. However, those people may not think they are. In fact, I have many friends who are Zainichi Koreans but I do not see any difference from myself. People around them would not even recognize them as Koreans or Okinawans if they do not claim it. Also, I do not think they would categorize themselves as socially weak people neither. As a result, I think it is going to be hard to draw the line for categorization since the self identification and identification by others varies as it does in Brazil’s color differences.

In addition, I think there are some risks too. Considering this type of situation around me, I am afraid that by taking affirmative action, it emphasizes the difference more than today and it simply ends up labeling them as inferiors. Also, there are some people who are ethically privileged in this society but struggling with some problems. It is possible that those people might get jealous of getting an affirmative action just because of their roots and this could be the cause to create racists. In conclusion, I think Japan should not take affirmative action because I do not think there is such clear distinction between the privileged and non-privileged in a sense of race inside of this country. It might help those who are socially weak systematically, but it can draw clearer borders and widen the distance mentally among people than today.

Will Latin-Americanization Happen in Japan in the Future?

by Yuriko Otsuka

In the book, Shades of difference; Why skin color matters, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn (2009), Eduardo Bonilla-Silva and David R. Dietrich said that the United States has becoming more like Latin America, where there are various mixed people who are said to be as one group. However, while people claim that they are consisted as one group, inequality still exists through their skin color, and people are facing a dilemma. This is called Latin-Americanization, and it is said to be happening in the U.S. now. The change of the immigration law allowed and more and more immigrants and a variety of races could be seen in America. As a result, more mixed children have been born. This is making it harder to categorize one’s skin color. Also, the proportion gap between whites and non-whites in the U.S. became wider, resulting that the number of whites is far more less that maybe in the future white supremacy could disappear or occur harshly than before.

The influence of the mass media has made Japanese more interesting to foreigners. For example, the K-POP, and Korean drama boom has made Japanese, especially girls and women to change their image against Koreans. They shifted their preference to Koreans due to the masculinity they show through TV. My mother and I for instance, like watching Korean dramas and TV’s. We used to have no interest, though one TV drama changed our ideas. In that drama, there was a guy whose face was very beautiful (this is how my mother expressed about him), and hence, she prefers watching Korean dramas now. In addition, the access and ease to go outside the country allowed people to meet many people from outside and give a broad view of how other people are like. Therefore, even though there are less numbers of couples compared to other countries, the trend of international marriage has gradually come into Japan.

However, problems still exist. While people open their mind broadly to overseas, the majority still cares about race. For instance, in Japan people still have some kind of prejudice against Asians; due to the relationship of colonizer and the colonized. In addition, we can tell that the majority of Japanese still distinguish themselves as Japanese or a foreigner, and among the foreigners we can tell that there is some kind of preferences. In conclusion, Japanese are gradually becoming more tolerant against foreigners as we can see from TV’s, while rules, regulations, and social norms still establishes some kind of line to distinguish foreigners and Japanese. Therefore, I think the influence of Latin-Americanization will be gradually happening in the near future, but would take more time compared to the U.S.

References:

Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, and Amanda E. Lewis. 1999. “The new racism: Toward an analysis of the U.S. racial structure 1960-1990s.” Pp. 55-101 in Race, Nation, and Citizenship, edited by Paul Wong. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, and Gianpaolo Biaocchi. 2001. “Anything but racism: How sociologists limit the significance of racism.” Race and society (4), 117-131.

Wikipedia, Gaikokujin keno (Dislike to foreigners). Retrieved from: http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%96%E5%9B%BD%E4%BA%BA%E5%AB%8C%E6%82%AA

As a “Latina”

by Moraima Flores

“We don’t have races here. We don’t have racism here.” (Bonilla-Silva & Dietrich p. 40) is how Latin America is described. Coming from a Latin American country I felt identified with this statement, because, as I see it, someone born in Paraguay is Paraguayan not matter the color of their skin or the roots of their family. In comparison with the United States division of races (white-black) Latin America has a more complex way of looking at “race.” We define “race” as color, meaning that it doesn’t matter if your parents have roots in Africa and Europe (black-white), if you are light-skinned you are white, or maybe the other way around. There are also more complex ways of defining color, because we don’t divide everything in “black and white;” but we also make differences between lighter and darker. By “making differences” I refer to recognizing, not discriminating.

As Bonilla-Silva and Dietrich pointed out, Latin America is color-blind. With my background, I have to recognize that I always thought of the United States as a racial discriminating country. Why? Because, while Americans openly talk about race and make differences (racism 1.0), we don’t openly talk about or pointed out (racism 2.0). I guess I was fooled by this because color-blindness sounds liberal, not discriminative, and equal (in the end, we are all Latin Americans!). We fail to recognize something important in this theory: the human being always makes judgments.

Once someone asked me “how long do you think it takes for a person to judge another one?” Needless to say I have no idea, but many people say it takes less than 30 seconds. Now I ask you, what do you think we measure when we make these judgments? If we only have 30 seconds from the moment we meet someone, looking at how we dress, how we walk/talk/smile and of course the color of our skin is not a crazy idea, is it? We base all these judgments on appearance, including skin color, color of hair and eyes, bone structure, etc. (phenotype); the rest comes later. With this I only mean to point out that we are all “racist” in some level, whether we are aware of it or not.

From a Latin American point of view, I have trouble understanding the American division of race. Race is not something visible, color is; and although I am not saying we should forget about race and make differences based on skin color, as I said before, it’s something we already do unconsciously. However, maybe we should keep making differences in a way of positive discrimination.

Reference

Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo and David R. Dietrich. 2009. “The Latin Americanization of U.S. Race Relations.” Pp. 40-60 in Shades of Difference: Why Skin Color Matters, edited by E. Nakano Glenn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press